PDA

View Full Version : Let's Cast Stones


Xenocrates
July 23, 2007, 08:43 PM
Who is worse, a prostitute that charges a fee, or an unmarried woman who does it for free? :eusa_thin

Bling
July 23, 2007, 09:20 PM
Nothing in this world is free, so just do a business analysis and make your choice.

silentburn
July 23, 2007, 09:22 PM
How does an unmarried woman prostitute herself for free?

Xenocrates
July 23, 2007, 10:40 PM
Are you guys saying that there's still a cost involved either way?

tiffany
July 23, 2007, 11:10 PM
How does an unmarried woman prostitute herself for free?

then it's not prostitution............



Xenocrates ...Are you guys saying that there's still a cost involved either way?

Well, if you want to look at it like that, you can say that there is a price that is being paid either way. Assuming both parties consent, it's a transaction, each gave up something in exchange for the favor.. ie. energy, pride,reputation, money, etc..

Both are sins and no sin is greater than the next in God's eyes, and in terms of cost in another sense, there may be hell to pay...

Bahama Mama
July 23, 2007, 11:47 PM
Who is worse, a prostitute that charges a fee, or an unmarried woman who does it for free? :eusa_thin

Since they are both engaging in sex outside the confines of marriage, technically they are/should be equal when it comes to this infraction of Christian morals.

tiffany
July 24, 2007, 01:32 AM
yea.. but i think Xeno only presented it from that angle so that the discussion would be less amgibuous and not be spread all over.

Xenocrates
July 24, 2007, 10:05 AM
Which one is ultimately cheaper?

Madhacker
July 24, 2007, 10:25 AM
The prostitute u get over with and dont have to see her again

ramesh
July 24, 2007, 10:53 AM
The prostitute u get over with and don't have to see her again Especially if she's your Super Ex-Girlfriend (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0465624/). ;)

Bling
July 24, 2007, 01:32 PM
Which one is ultimately cheaper?

Its like mac and Pc

PC: i made $ ***** having sex with a guy last night.

Mac: That same guy spent more than that on me when we went shopping yesterday and i havn't even gave him a hug yet.

duster
July 24, 2007, 01:43 PM
Who is worse, a prostitute that charges a fee, or an unmarried woman who does it for free? :eusa_thin

none they are both wonderful providin they both tight.:eusa_danc most unmarried women are protitutes anyway. itsjust that dem tek money from just a few men when compared to an outright HOE.

Gillion
July 24, 2007, 01:49 PM
LOL !!!!!!! at thread.

Bahama Mama
July 24, 2007, 01:53 PM
Which one is ultimately cheaper?

Qualitatively or Quantitatively?

nuhsenutten
July 24, 2007, 02:59 PM
Qualitatively or Quantitatively?

quality over qunatity :icon_mrgr

Manu
July 24, 2007, 03:48 PM
The unmarried woman is worse.... atleast you can agree to the terms of the agreement and payment upfront with the prostitute. There is no downpayment (before marriage)....inflation (after marriage)... then compensation (death).

Bahama Mama
July 24, 2007, 04:22 PM
From a quantitative aspect, the unmarried woman is cheaper. She is relinquishing her 'affections' (sex being in the mix), without a commitment clause financial or otherwise, being in this case marriage. Since marriage is more than just an emotional commitment but a financial one as well to each other. When one thinks about it, marriage quantitatively is the steepest price to pay for sex. :eusa_thin

Xenocrates
July 24, 2007, 04:23 PM
Isn't the unmarried woman considerably less cost effective? I mean, you spend thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars during courtship with no guarantee of a payoff... It's a major financial risk isn't it? I mean think about it: If marriage doesn't result from all that hard work, what was the point?

Manu
July 24, 2007, 04:31 PM
Isn't the unmarried woman considerably less cost effective? I mean, you spend thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars during courtship with no guarantee of a payoff... It's a major financial risk isn't it? I mean think about it: If marriage doesn't result from all that hard work, what was the point?


SEX SEX AND MORE SEX.... but only if you get any :p

Bahama Mama
July 24, 2007, 04:39 PM
Isn't the unmarried woman considerably less cost effective? I mean, you spend thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars during courtship with no guarantee of a payoff... It's a major financial risk isn't it? I mean think about it: If marriage doesn't result from all that hard work, what was the point?

If the ultimate intent is marriage, why is some of the consideration being put on a prostitute? A prostitute will probably have no will for marriage in the first place, regardless of the money that is spent on her.

silentburn
July 24, 2007, 04:40 PM
Isn't the unmarried woman considerably less cost effective? I mean, you spend thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars during courtship with no guarantee of a payoff... It's a major financial risk isn't it? I mean think about it: If marriage doesn't result from all that hard work, what was the point?

Well how can the unmarried woman be considered a prostitute if she didn't surrender her body in the first place? There has to be a trade of service for money. The above scenario would disqualify the woman from being a prostitute as she has a choice as to whether she will give in or not. She is not obligated to provide service even if she gets large sums of cash or any other assets. The woman mentioned above has to be defined differently

Remember the question.
Who is worse, a prostitute that charges a fee, or an unmarried woman who does it for free? :eusa_thin

Xenocrates
July 24, 2007, 05:14 PM
If the ultimate intent is marriage, why is some of the consideration being put on a prostitute? A prostitute will probably have no will for marriage in the first place, regardless of the money that is spent on her. - The whole point of men needing women is for sex and then procreation (facilitated by sex). Otherwise women would serve very little other purpose. So, from a purely objective p.o.v., what's the point of spending all that dough on an single woman, if the payoff is not guaranteed?

Well how can the unmarried woman be considered a prostitute if she didn't surrender her body in the first place? There has to be a trade of service for money. - Lots of unmarried women surrender their bodies on the first date - sometimes just after meeting a dude @ a party. It's called ATI my friend. :icon_neut

The above scenario would disqualify the woman from being a prostitute as she has a choice as to whether she will give in or not. She is not obligated to provide service even if she gets large sums of cash or any other assets. - It's the same with prostitutes. Prostitutes won't do everything you ask or want to pay for. Don't you watch HBO? :eusa_thin

silentburn
July 24, 2007, 05:37 PM
- The whole point of men needing women is for sex and then procreation (facilitated by sex). Otherwise women would serve very little other purpose. So, from a purely objective p.o.v., what's the point of spending all that dough on a single woman, if the payoff is not guaranteed?

We also need women for companionship. We are social beings, sex is not the only thing that drives us. We need someone to protect and care for, someone who will trust and lean on us. Someone who will stand by our side in partnership. Its not just about sex.

- Lots of unmarried women surrender their bodies on the first date - sometimes just after meeting a dude @ a party. It's called ATI my friend. :icon_neut

HA! Yea I got in an argument about this once. Tried hard to explain to the person that ATI is just one big orgy on the beach. The music is sexually charged, people, oops I mean women are skimpily dressed, (believe it or not the men are usually fully clothed). The whole atmosphere is sexually charged. So even if you don't partake physically, your mind is already filled with desire. Anyway back to the topic. Ahhhh, but if the woman surrenders her body on the first date then it works out more economical for the dude.

- It's the same with prostitutes. Prostitutes won't do everything you ask or want to pay for. Don't you watch HBO? :eusa_thin

More often than not she will provide the man with what he wants. Unless he has psychological issues and wants to do some crap.

Manu
July 24, 2007, 06:08 PM
That's why you should not go ATI unless you're single.

Bahama Mama
July 24, 2007, 07:08 PM
- The whole point of men needing women is for sex and then procreation (facilitated by sex). Otherwise women would serve very little other purpose. So, from a purely objective p.o.v., what's the point of spending all that dough on an single woman, if the payoff is not guaranteed?


The only thing absolutely guaranteed in this life, are death and bills. With everything else especially as it regards human relations, there is no guarantee of the desired outcome. What is the point? There is no point, only risk, and that is what needs to be weighed in said situation.

silentburn
July 24, 2007, 08:21 PM
That's why you should not go ATI unless you're single.

:confused: Why do you say only single people should go? People in relationships will fit right into the atmosphere.

Can you imagine how many people will be having sex in that one location over the weekend? :icon_eek: Some will be brazen and do it on secluded spot on the beach/club while the majority will wait till they reach their hotel room or car.

The only thing absolutely guaranteed in this life, are death and bills. With everything else especially as it regards human relations, there is no guarantee of the desired outcome. What is the point? There is no point, only risk, and that is what needs to be weighed in said situation.

True

Manu
July 24, 2007, 08:49 PM
:confused: Why do you say only single people should go? People in relationships will fit right into the atmosphere.




Temptation my friend. It's like going to an all you can eat (please dont take it out of context) buffet. (ok...that part you can take out of context :icon_mrgr)

Xenocrates
July 25, 2007, 06:52 AM
We also need women for companionship. We are social beings, sex is not the only thing that drives us. We need someone to protect and care for, someone who will trust and lean on us. Someone who will stand by our side in partnership. Its not just about sex. - If women are so underrated now, can you imagine if they didn't have that luscious box between the legs? Think about it.

...I mean women are skimpily dressed, (believe it or not the men are usually fully clothed). The whole atmosphere is sexually charged. - That's a phenomenon I've yet to fully understand. It's not just at ATI, it's at virtually every beach party / session in Jamaica. We have such a weird sub-culture; it would appear that women in this country enjoy being objectified as pieces of meat like that. Fine by me. :eusa_shif

In fact, I'm going to go to ATI to conduct some scientific research. Who's coming with? :icon_mrgr

Anyway back to the topic. - I was wondering when that'd happen. LOL :rotflm:

Ahhhh, but if the woman surrenders her body on the first date then it works out more economical for the dude. - So economically, the prostitute is more cost effective - although you do get what you pay for. I mean, in the case of an unmarried woman, it could be rationalised that the extra dough paid in courtship warrants you a more meaningful, sustainable payoff, right?

More often than not she will provide the man with what he wants. Unless he has psychological issues and wants to do some crap. - Some prostitutes don't sleep with men who they don't consider attractive. Strange but true. LOL

The only thing absolutely guaranteed in this life, are death and bills. With everything else especially as it regards human relations, there is no guarantee of the desired outcome. What is the point? There is no point, only risk, and that is what needs to be weighed in said situation. - I would've said that there's no point: only opportunity.

smiles
July 25, 2007, 11:23 AM
- If women are so underrated now, can you imagine if they didn't have that luscious box between the legs? Think about it.

THEN YOU'D ALL JUST BE GAY... :eusa_thin NO?


In fact, I'm going to go to ATI to conduct some scientific research. Who's coming with? :icon_mrgr

PLEASE REFER TO THREAD "LOVE IS SHALLOW" BEFORE GOING. THERE ARE SOME RATHER INTERESTING THEORIES THERE ABOUT WHAT KINDA GUYS GIRLS WILL PICK.. ARE YOU P.D.U?


Some prostitutes don't sleep with men who they don't consider attractive. Strange but true. LOL

FROM EXPERIENCE? LOL (JUST TEASING).

. .

root_gal
July 25, 2007, 02:02 PM
In fact, I'm going to go to ATI to conduct some scientific research. Who's coming with? :icon_mrgr



Come in then nuh. Let me grab my notepad and let's go. :eusa_danc

distin
July 25, 2007, 02:54 PM
Who is worse, a prostitute that charges a fee, or an unmarried woman who does it for free? :eusa_thin

technically they are both sailing in the same boat....... they are both having sex out of marriage and witha alot of persons so they are both prostitutes right????:icon_ques:icon_ques:eusa_thin

distin
July 25, 2007, 03:00 PM
In fact, I'm going to go to ATI to conduct some scientific research. Who's coming with? :icon_mrgr

yeah ill be their with my laptop and mirciscope:eusa_booh

Manu
July 25, 2007, 03:26 PM
Feeling ATI this time around.... 7500 for season band nuh?!

g2cris
July 25, 2007, 03:28 PM
Boy look how we treat our women bad.

silentburn
July 25, 2007, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by Xeno

In fact, I'm going to go to ATI to conduct some scientific research. Who's coming with?


Originally posted by Root Gal

Come in then nuh. Let me grab my notepad and let's go.

I want to observe too, may not be able to make it this year though :( . Yow Xeno, take plenty pictures, remember its free eye candy.

Please direct all other ATI related comments to this thread. More ATI here, click on me. (http://www.caribyard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5854)