PDA

View Full Version : President


Pondadat
November 3, 2004, 10:43 AM
Bush wins popular vote in electoral nail-biter; Kerry weighing concession
Updated at 10:08 on November 3, 2004, EST.

President Bush supporters wave flags during an election rally early

Wednesday, at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

WASHINGTON (CP) - President George W. Bush inched closer to a second term on Wednesday as aides to Democratic challenger John Kerry considered conceding the state of Ohio after an election cliffhanger that ultimately showed Americans were wary of dumping their war-time incumbent.

More Americans cast their ballots for Bush this time around than they did four years ago as he picked up 51 per cent of the popular vote. He also held a 136,000-vote lead in the crucial and deciding state of Ohio - and chances grew slimmer on Wednesday that the Democrats could overturn that lead even after provisional ballots are counted in 11 days.

Kerry aides were meeting and a statement was planned by midday. Two of them said his concession seemed simply a matter of time.

The Republicans were confident.

"We are convinced that President Bush has won re-election," said White House chief of staff Andy Card.

Bush himself was to declare victory and had only put it off as a courtesy to Kerry "to allow the opportunity to look at the situation in the cold hard light of day," said Republican Party chairman Marc Racicot.

The electoral college map looked much like it did before the election; the question mark had simply moved from the state of Ohio from Florida but little else had changed.

Bush won Florida again this time, by a wider margin than in 2000. But his efforts to wrest Pennsylvania from the Democratic column fell short, and Kerry picked up New Hampshire in perhaps the election's only turnover.

In Ohio, Kerry won among young adults, but lost in every other age group. One-fourth of Ohio voters identified themselves as born-again Christians and they backed Bush by a 3-to-1 margin.

A sideline issue in the national presidential campaign, gay civil unions may have been a sleeper that hurt Kerry - who strongly supports that right - in Ohio and elsewhere. Ohio residents expanded their law banning gay marriage, already considered the toughest in the country, with an even broader constitutional amendment against civil unions.

After winning Nevada in the wee hours Wednesday, Bush had 254 electoral votes without counting Ohio's 20, which would put him four votes over the 270 required for a second term. Kerry stalled at 252 electoral votes after narrowly winning Wisconsin.

The number of each state's electoral votes is determined by its population.

With Republican wins in the House of Representatives and the Senate, it was a banner night for conservatives who favour huge tax cuts and a social agenda that outlaws same-sex marriage and abortion rights.

A large number of Americans voted after a bruising, bare-knuckle campaign focused on the Iraq war, terrorist threats and lost jobs. About 120 million cast ballots, just under 60 per cent of eligible voters - the highest since 1968.

But the big numbers didn't translate into the votes for Kerry that analysts predicted, and instead may have actually benefitted Bush, who fought to avoid the fate that befell his father 12 years ago - that of a one-term president.

Long lines at voting stations indicated that the fractious eight-month campaign, marked by scare tactics, negative TV ads, misleading claims and vicious personal attacks, engaged Americans like no other race in recent history.

National and state polls long suggested Bush and Kerry were in a dead heat, with independent candidate Ralph Nader getting about one per cent of the vote.

Voters were divided sharply along age, gender, religious and racial lines, according to national exit polls.

Bush was favoured among white men, voters with family incomes over $100,000 US and evangelical Christians who view him as a messenger from God in a titanic fight to quell terrorism and spread liberty around the world, while Kerry was the overwhelming favourite of black voters, Hispanics, union households and was supported by many younger voters.

One in 10 voters were casting ballots for the first time and fewer than 10 per cent were young voters - hardly the flood that experts had predicted.

Bush, facing heavy U.S. casualties in Iraq and a sluggish economy that's resulted in more jobs lost than created during his tenure, based his campaign on who best can protect the country from terrorists. He traded heavily on his determined leadership after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 - a platform that drew fire from some that he exploited the worst fears of Americans.

Interestingly, voters in the states that were hit on Sept. 11 - the District of Columbia, New York and Pennsylvania - lined up solidly behind Kerry.

The Canadian Press, 2004

Pondadat
November 3, 2004, 11:30 AM
Its looks like liberal gay america is not to happy today. I would think that Kerry was to outspoken about his views on gay marriage. It seems that American's are still opposed to this type of relationship. I will look for some articles on it. But I will give Bush that he was opposed to those types of unions and he stood behind it. The conservative christian majority made there decision and it seems that alot were wrong when they thought that

America had turned into a fully gay country. There are still people in America with fundamental beliefs and not all of them believe that gays should have the same rights. I think that there are still some question on how far they should go. Should they consider amending the constitution because gay people always turn to that when fighting about their rights and the obligations of the government. But I dont believe they will amend it or maybe they will. Its debatable so were they stand now is without a doubt were they dont want to be. They have been stopped, so what will they do now.

Pondadat
November 3, 2004, 12:08 PM
If you thought the election would be armageddon then thinking beyond the election is the next process. Took this paragraph from some article I just read.


Which reminds me: if we view this election as Armageddon--maybe not in our speech, but in the emotionalism and fear that we carry within ourselves (something I've become very attuned to in my own faith walk over time has been that my inner emotions need to square with my intellectual realizations, and moreover, that I've failed miserably at that very task in the past, which is what led to runaway anxiety for me last year)--then if Kerry wins, we must necessarily think that everything will be OK in America again.


So carry did not when and she is reminded that liberal christians have to come to a relization and reciprocate as some other well known believers in faiths such as Gandhi and King. How do you utilize your faith now as a liberal christian.

Pondadat
November 3, 2004, 12:20 PM
The thought of more war just makes me want to vomit when I think about if this A'Hole takes us into another war.what will happen next?

Bush's victory stirs outrage
From correspondents in Islamabad
04nov04(remember there time is ahead)

US President George W. Bush's election victory stirred reactions ranging from relief to outrage in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and fears over what four more years of the war on terror could mean for the Muslim world.

Both governments have been close supporters of the US-led drive to oust the Taliban and hunt down remnants al-Qaeda, and were expected to welcome the result.
Yet many ordinary citizens had hoped for a more moderate president in John Kerry, and greeted the prospect of "A win for Bush will be bad for Muslims," said laundry shop manager Mohammed Ali Akhtar, 48, who was watching the results come in on Fox TV in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad. "He invaded Afghanistan, then Iraq and now he is planning to hit Syria and Iran."

"I just hate him. I just hate his face," said market trader Mehtab Butt, 50, in the eastern city of Lahore.

Zoley!
November 3, 2004, 07:31 PM
I second that thought on the war and your info was good about the issue.

Zoley!
November 3, 2004, 07:51 PM
Here is joke for you! ;)

BUSH: Knock Knock

KERRY: Who's there?

BUSH: BUSH!

KERRY: BUSH WHO?

BUSH: BUSHYT YOU!!!

Babyjay
November 5, 2004, 01:57 PM
Oh well :eusa_snoo , there goes America's economy

Zoley!
November 5, 2004, 02:11 PM
Not just America Everyone! The system is run on the economic structure of the dominant countries. Everyone in third world countries rely on the growth of the more wealthy countries for their survival. So the whole system is effected by what goes on in America.

ramesh
November 5, 2004, 02:36 PM
There's a saying, "When America sneeze, Jamaica get the Flu".

Pondadat
November 5, 2004, 08:42 PM
Ow! :eusa_doh: